Skip to Content

Ballista vs. Scorpion-(A detailed comparison)

Ballista vs. Scorpion-(A detailed comparison)

The Ballista is an excellent all-around siege weapon, while the Scorpion is a siege weapon designed specifically for unit destruction.

A ballista kills units and damages walls, which is acceptable for a ballista. A scorpion has low damage and the inability to damage walls and gates, but more ammo and a faster rate of fire than other siege weapons. The siege weapon that kills units. Catapults and Onagers are better at taking walls, but have less ammo and accuracy, making them less effective at killing troops.

A ballista and a scorpion are two different siege weapons. They have contrasting designs and purposes. I will discuss the features of both the weapons and their usage. You will get all the information you need to know about these weapons. Just stay connected till the end.

What is the distinction between a ballista and a scorpion?

There are many differences between both weapons. They seem quite similar, but they are not. A ballista is any large crossbow-like siege engine, whereas a scorpion is a small, usually metal, ballista.
The scorpion only threw darts and was a piece of lightweight and mobile artillery that used maximum arrows of three spans. they were approximate 69cm.

On the other hand, the ballista was a heavy artillery piece capable of launching not only javelins but also stones and “acorns lead” weighing up to 45 kg.

The difference between a scorpion and a ballista is that a ballista is much larger and must be built on-site; it cannot be moved with horses and assembled quickly like a scorpion.

The basic physical and mechanical principles were the same, but it’s like comparing a mortar and a howitzer.

They differ in some of the properties but are almost the same.

What do you know about Ballista?

A ballista was a large siege engine with a counterweight that was designed to throw large stones, They were also thrown as severed heads at fortifications to cause both fear and disease.

Ballistae were more capable of supporting large armies. They are incredibly accurate at most distances. Also, unlike in Rome I and Medieval 2, true ballistae used loose stones rather than bolts.

Bringing a ballista into multiplayer is a bad idea because it will never kill its own cost (1700) in enemy units unless the enemy piles a bunch of units into a big ball and sits there letting you shoot at him.

There are a bunch of advantages and disadvantages to both weapons that vary from person to person with experience.

An image showing a knight holding a scorpion sword
A fantasy warrior with a scorpion sword

What do you know about a scorpion?

A Scorpio is also known as a Scorpion. It was a much smaller device, similar to a large crossbow mounted on a base, that was capable of throwing small stones. It was designed to fire large arrows at the same time. 

In other words, the Scorpion is a miniature ballista. The crossbow is the smallest variant of the same basic technology as the Scorpion, which is a mobile field artillery unit used as an anti-personnel device during combat encounters.

Because the Scorpion lacks the power of siege ballistae machines, it is not used as an anti-material weapon.

As already discussed, Ballista never kills its own cost, which is 1700. Scorpions, on the other hand, are capable of killing more people than they cost (550) by sniping elites or generals. This is the defining characteristic of the two.

Ballista vs. Catapult

The difference between a ballista and a catapult is that a ballista is an ancient military engine in the shape of a crossbow used for hurling large missiles, whereas a catapult is a device or weapon for throwing or launching large objects. The objects are mechanical aid n aircraft carriers designed to assist airplanes in taking off from the flight deck.

The table shows different types of ballista and catapults.

Types of BallistaeTypes of Catapults
Walking BallistaMangonels
Bontrager ballistaOnager
Heavy BallistaTrebuchet
Roman BallistaArrow and stone-throwing ballista
Different types of Ballista and Catapults

How accurate is ballista?

The ballista was a highly accurate weapon. Although there are numerous accounts of single soldiers being picked off by ballista operators, some design features meant that they could sacrifice accuracy for range.

The maximum range was more than 500 yards (460 meters). That is, the effective combat range for many targets was much shorter.

The Thrower of Flames If you feel the need to throw some fire around, federal law allows you to buy a flamethrower, and 40 states have no laws prohibiting the weapon’s possession.

Unlicensed possession is only a misdemeanor in some states, such as California, where it is prohibited. So, licensing is very important for all these weapons.

Check out this video to learn more about the difference between these two tools.

Which one is better, ballista or a catapult?

A ballista is a crossbow-like ancient military siege engine. It was typically used to hurl large bolts, and it had better accuracy than a catapult, at the expense of a shorter range.

What are the types of catapults?

Four types of catapults are listed below:

  • Mangonels
  • Ballista
  • Onagers
  • Trebuchets
They all use three types of motive force: tension, torsion, and gravity.

Which is more effective, a ballista or a trebuchet?

A catapult isolated on a white background
A catapult is made of concrete material

A trebuchet is much more effective at knocking down walls and killing multiple people, though it is more difficult to aim. A Ballista is best suited for shooting through siege towers and other obstacles. Arrows cannot penetrate, are too close to the trebuchet, and are too far away for the boiling oil.

However, if you want to take a castle, a trebuchet is your best bet.

A ballista is essentially a large crossbow. It is a weapon that fires directly at the target. While a trebuchet is similar to modern artillery. It’s a weapon that fires indirectly.

An Onager has a longer range than a ballista, fewer parts, and more power thanks to its single rope torsion spring. You could build a trebuchet much faster and for a lot less money if you used a falling weight instead of a lot of very expensive rope.

Trebuchets accelerate more slowly, so you don’t break your arms. Because gravity is very consistent, you can hit the same spot repeatedly by adjusting the weight of your ammunition. The Mistah Ballista was the machine we created and used in the Pumpkin Hurling Competition.

Trebuchets throw for longer distances, but they must be built; ballistae are also good at ranges, but they lack power when compared to trebuchets.

The disadvantages of both trebuchets and ballistas are as follows:

  • Trebuchets are massive and easy targets for fire arrows;
  • Ballistas have weak ammunition and do not have a high angle of fire like trebuchets.
A ballista isolated on a white background giving a top view
There are five types of ballistae based on motive forces

Is a trebuchet superior to a ballista?

The difference between a trebuchet and a ballista is that a trebuchet is a medieval siege engine consisting of a large pivoting arm heavily weighted on one end and considered the technological successor to the catapult, whereas a ballista is an ancient military engine in the form of a crossbow used for hurling large missiles.

You get more power with far less rope and other materials because the arm of a trebuchet twisted its arm through 90 degrees or more. Also, you could make two Onagers out of one ballista’s worth of materials, which would either throw a given rock much further or a much heavier rock the same distance.

Hence, it seems that a trebuchet is better than a ballista.

When was the first ballista invented?

A ballista differs from a crossbow in that it stores energy in the form of a torsion spring (twisted skeins of rope). A crossbow makes use of the natural flexing and springiness of a wooden shaft.

The advantage of a ballista is that it is scalable—a crossbow’s bow-shaft will break after a certain amount of stress, but you can keep increasing the torsion skein size (up to a certain point, then it becomes unwieldy). Ballistae can now throw much larger projectiles.

The ancient Greeks used an Oxybele, a platform-mounted siege crossbow. Under Philip II (circa 350 B.C.), the nascent Macedonian Empire began to experiment with torsion skein technology, though it may have been invented earlier.

By the time Phillip’s son, Alexander the Great, went on his conquest spree, the ballista was undoubtedly in use.

I think now you are familiar with the use of ballista and scorpion, along with types of catapults and the contrasting features of all these weapons.

Here’s another informative video.

How does a ballista work?

A ballista is a type of ancient missile launcher used to launch javelins or heavy balls. Torsion was used to propel ballistae, which were powered by two thick skeins of twisted cords through which were thrust two separate arms, joined at their ends by the cord that propelled the missile.

The force of motion is what causes the ballista to work and move.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, a ballista and a scorpion are two contrasting siege weapons. A ballista is an ancient military engine in the shape of a crossbow that was used to launch large missiles. A scorpion is an old military engine that was used to launch stones and other missiles.

The contrasting feature between a scorpion and a ballista is that the ballista is much larger and cannot be moved with horses or be assembled. A scorpion can be moved and assembled too. Based on motive forces, there are five types of catapults. Mangonels, trebuchets, arrows, and stone catapults are some of the names. There are different types of ballistics as well, such as the Roman ballistae and the walking ballista.

Thus, all of these weapons are unique in their way. Several features are considered better in one, while some are considered the weak points in the other.

Other Articles

For the web story version of this article, click here.

Skip to content