11 min read

In Chocolate Factory (Charlie and the Chocolate Factory) Charley and his family live at the factory with Mr. Wonka, as well as Augustus Gloop, Veruca Salt, and Violet Beauregarde, and Mike Teavee.
This isn’t shown in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.
Mel Stuart directed Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, a 1971 American musical fantasy film starring Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka. It’s based on Roald Dahl’s novel Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, published in 1964.
For many of us, Charlie and the Chocolate factory has been one of our favorites. We enjoyed our childhood with games that were based on this novel, didn’t we?
Today, we’ll be discussing the two books, and films; Charlie and the chocolate factory plus Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory. I’ll be addressing the differences between both the films mentioned above along with in-depth contrasts.
Let’s get started.
The most important contrast between Willy Wonka and Charlie and the Chocolate factory is that Willy Wonka’s version is more musical.
Wonka and other characters break into songs (such as “Pure Imagination” and “The Candy Man”), whereas the latter solely has musical numbers from the Oompa-Loompas.
The Oompa-Loompas’ songs are riddles in the 1971 picture, and Burton’s version was more faithful to the book because Danny Elfman adapted the songs directly from the novel.
Willy Wonka incorporated numerous sequences from the novel, some of which were adjusted for narrative and visual purposes, but Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is more loyal to the book in the end.
Both deleted several sections from the book that wasn’t really crucial such as the square candies. They appear to be round, but Burton’s version is more faithful to the book’s depiction of the characters and their defects.
Willy Wonka’s appearance is itself a depiction of this.
Roald Dahl repudiated the 1971 adaptation for a variety of reasons, including the fact that he believed it placed “too much focus on Willy Wonka and not enough on Charlie.”
In addition to that, Gene Wilder was the lead instead of Spike Milligan.
The way Slug worth was a spy, the way the “fizzy lifting drink” sequence was written, the use of music other than the Oompa-Loompa songs, and the final dialogue were all things Dahl didn’t agree with.
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is a more family-friendly film than Burton’s version. Even though the tunnel scene gave many people nightmares, it still remains a classic. Considering that, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a better adaptation of Roald Dahl’s book.
Although both the films are based on the same book, the actors and crew are all unique.
The Oompa Loompas have a different appearance than the ones in the 1971 film, and Willy Wonka has a different demeanor. While the other characters in the 2005 picture (Charlie, Grandpa Joe, the wicked children, and their parents) are more like the ones in the original book.
Furthermore, The Oompa Loompa songs in the 2005 film are a better depiction of whatever was described in the book.
In fact, the later film is far more faithful to the book than the earlier film, with the exception of Violet’s sequence, which is far more related to the one in the book.
Hence, both of them are distinct books with interesting characters.
Although my choice may differ from yours, I enjoy the older film because of the sweets, the charm, and many other factors.
But in the second, it can be seen that much more money went into the production as the factory appears to be far more futuristic and surreal than its appearance suggests. The characters have more individuality and are given a wider representation.
Augustice is a glutton and brags about it in front of the boy while Vurunca looks far more rich with the coat and shows the behavior. Her behavior makes her more boastful. It shows the bratty behavior far better than in the first movie,
The narrator who is an Oompa Loompa reveals all of it so we can attach more and he is more focused on the candy. Violet is more about the gym.
As far as I remember, she is given more attention here than in the first movie.
All in all, I’m going with Gene as Willy Wonka from the original. The one with Depp is eerie and sinister.
Yes, I was aware that the novel was also spooky and dark. I’m also aware that Depp’s version is more faithful to the source material!
I still prefer Charlie and the Chocolate Factory to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.
The factory just looks better; the candy is better, especially that Chocolate River and the lore. Even the music is wilder.
Talking about the factory, it’s insane and beautiful. It truly sets this apart from any other.
The elevator is safer and not as sudden and destructive as its rival, but it comes through the roof of Charlie’s house, which wasn’t really that criminal or means.
There’s more focus on the family, and well, I don’t know how to explain it in more detail.
So, it appears this one is indeed superior and Matt Pat doesn’t have to worry about O.S.H.A. fining this place.
He said Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory is the superior version. He is right on that for the majority of votes, but is it truly the best?
With all of this information, you decide.
“It’s not a sequel; it’s a prologue.”
In an interview with Collider in 2018, Heyman stated that the next project would be a prequel, set before the events of Roald Dahl’s popular children’s book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and its two film adaptations.
Talking about Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory, it was a strange situation for Willy Wonka, with his father being a dentist and not allowing him to consume candy.
Moreover, people liked the 1971 version as this was closer to the book.
Unlike the response of the majority, I prefer the remake.
Here I’ll be quoting some of the significant differences between both the movies.
Mostly because it’s based on a novel, and without the novel, neither film would exist. The original one was also disliked by Roald Daul.
As I previously stated, the 2005 version generally follows the plot of the novel, whereas the 1971 version appears to have cut out a lot of it, some of which may have been due to technological backwardness.
As an example, consider Veruca Salt’s demise. It’s squirrels in the book; in 1971, it was changed to golden goose eggs.
In 2005, they used squirrels; any that were close up was real, but the majority of the ones in the backdrop were puppets. The ones who were attacked were also real.
The oompa loompas were not like the other oompa loompas. They were orange with green hair in 1971, and they were all the same in 2005.
Thankfully, 2005 isn’t a musical. With the exception of the Oompa Loompa songs. This was one of the seemingly different characteristics.
Willy Wonka has a backstory in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, where he wasn’t permitted to have suites and his father was a dentist.
I hope now you’re familiar with the differences between both the films, aren’t you?
He desired to retire, but he needed someone he could entrust with his business.
Someone who was honest, trustworthy, and compassionate, because it wasn’t just about the factory’s integrity or the future of candies.
In fact, it was also about the Oompa Loompas, and he needed someone to look after them and keep them safe. When Charlie returned the Everlasting Gobstopper, he demonstrated his honesty and integrity, as well as his value.
That’s how Charlie ended up with the plant.
Let’s have a look at the characters of Charlie and the chocolate factory; who played whom.
Characters | Real Names |
Willy Wonka | Johnny Depp |
Charlie Bucket | Freddie Highmore |
Veruca Salt | Julia Winter |
Mike Teavee | Jordan Fry |
According to IMDb, the story will focus on a young Willy Wonka and how he met the Oompa Loompas on one of his earliest adventures,
The story will center on a young Willy Wonka and how he first met the Oompa-Loompas during one of his early trips.
Both versions of Roald Dahl’s masterwork, however, have their own virtues, making them the best rendition of the narrative.
For better or worse, the tunnel sequence is one of the most unforgettable moments of the 1971 classic. Everyone who has seen the film knows exactly where they are when they see that moment for the first time.
It’s without a doubt one of the most terrifying scenes in a family film.
To conclude, I’d say that,
I’ve given details of all the variations that both the movies comprise. Also, I’ve catered to some of the most FAQs regarding these films in this article.
Want to find out the difference between Carnage and Venom? Take a look at this article: Carnage VS Venom: A Detailed Comparison
What Is the Difference Between a Caiman, an Alligator, and a Crocodile? (Difference Explained)
What Is The Difference Between Shemale and a Transwoman? (Explained)
Holiday Inn VS Holiday Inn Express (Differences)
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.