Skip to Content

The Difference Between A High-res Flac 24/96+ and A Normal Uncompressed 16-bit CD

The Difference Between A High-res Flac 24/96+ and A Normal Uncompressed 16-bit CD

For centuries people have had a variety of audio devices and musical gadgets. People used to use CDs that were not compressed. It had many pros and cons.

However, the 21st century has several high-resolution compressed forms of gadgets, such as Mp3, also known as high-res Flac. Because the number denotes the number of bits per sample, there are always some advantages and disadvantages to the various types of music versions.

The Flac file has 24 bits per sample instead of 16 bits on a CD and a sample rate of 96kHz instead of 44.1 kHz on a CD. It may be much better in quality depending on the quality of the source recording, or it may not be any better if it is converted from a digital source that is 16 bit/48 kHz in any case.

In this article, you’ll get a breakdown of all these music devices and their contrasts, including the upgraded high-resolution compressed and uncompressed forms.

Let’s get started.

High-res Flac 24/96+ Vs. A Normal Uncompressed 16-bit CD

You might wonder what led to a music device being called a “high-resolution Flac”, as it was something referring to the display of TV, right?

But that is not the case. There are some noticeable differences between the uncompressed 16-bit CD and the high-res Flac 24/96+.

They are way too different in terms of their qualities and daily life usage.

Assume a 16-bit, 44.1 kHz data stream is resampled with a 24-bit, 96kHz converter, and we now have a lot more data but no more information. The LSB byte per sample will only contain zeros or noise, and each sample in the data stream will contain the same data.

Only by converting it to FLAC will you save data storage space. Now compare that to a master analog feed; excellent microphones, etc., with an incredibly dynamic range of 22 bits.

And it is fed into two ADCs at the same time, one at 96k and 24-bit resolution, and the other at 44K and 16 bit. The data will be different, with the high resolution containing more.

Here is a breakdown of some of the main file formats.

File FormatsDistinctive features
MP3 (non-high-resolution)This popular, lossy-compressed format ensures a small file size but poor sound quality.
AAC (non-high-resolution) A lossy and compressed alternative to MP3s that sounds better.
WAV (high-resolution) The standard format in which all CDs are encoded.
It does not support metadata (that is, album artwork, artist, and song title information).
AIFF (high-resolution)Apple’s high-resolution alternative to WAV, with improved metadata support.
It is lossless and uncompressed (hence the large file sizes), but it is not widely used.
ALAC (hi-res)Apple’s lossless compression format, which also does hi-res and stores metadata, takes up half the space of WAV.
An iTunes and iOS-compatible app
Types of file formats along with their description

What Do You Know About High-res Flac 24/96+ And A Normal Uncompressed 16-bit CD?

High-resolution recordings have a higher bit depth — 24 bits as opposed to 16 bits. The majority of program material does not make use of it. 

The ABX test confirmed that sampling rates greater than 44.1 Kbps make an audible difference. It could be a practical implementation issue rather than a theoretical limit.

The sampling theorem assumes that the digitized signal has no spectral content greater than half the sampling rate. The antialiasing filter in the analog-to-digital converter is subjected to high demands in music.

Remastering from older 48 kHz recordings can also result in an improvement.

On the other hand, a 16-bit CD is not a high-resolution CD, as it is not compressed and the quality of sound may not be the same as that of a high-resolution Flac. A 16-bit C, on the other hand, is less useful than a highly flaccid one due to its lack of portability.

The sampling rates and the quality of sound help you differentiate between both of these types.

16 BIT VS. 24 BIT Audio-What’s the difference?

Is 24-bit FLAC Superior To 16-bit FLAC?

Depending on the source, a direct 24/192 to 24/192 transfer should sound better than a 24/192 converted to 16/44.1 conversion. Both should sound the same if the source is 16/44.1.

24-bit / 192 kHz contains approximately 550 percent more data than 16-bit / 44.1 kHz. More sounds that are too high for people to hear can be represented at 192 kHz.

With 24 bits, you can capture the noise floor of the recording setup and such with greater resolution and detail, even though at playback, that extra stuff is generally going to be below your ambient room noise level anyway and drowned out by that, not to mention the intended sounds (music).

They are roughly equivalent in terms of having enough data for playback purposes for human consumption and perceived sound quality because the extra data is not noticeable or useful for that purpose.

In practice, some playback equipment may misbehave more with one sampling rate than another, and there are more technical constraints with 44.1 kHz and so on, but it should not make an audible difference.

Similarly, you can create a very fictitious scenario in which the extra bit depth is audible as lower noise. However, under more controlled testing (though not always), the differences that people believe they hear disappear.

An image showing a head phone rested against a creamy white background
The best audio quality can be determined by listing all sorts of music in different audio types

Is 24-bit 96kHz A Good Resolution?

A 320kbps MP3 file has a data rate of 9216kbps, whereas a 24-bit/192kHz file has a data rate of 9216kbps. Music CDs are 1411 kbps.

As a result, the high-resolution 24-bit/96kHz or 24-bit/192kHz files should more closely replicate the sound quality that the musicians and engineers were working on within the studio.

FLAC, which was first introduced in 2001, is introducing audiophiles to a whole new world of high-end, high-resolution audio: Given that 130dB is the pain threshold for the human ear, 24-bit digital has a theoretical resolution of 144dB. It is compared to around 96dB in CD’s 16-bit.

That means you can get closer to the master tape used in the studio while also gaining all of the information made possible by the higher data rates of these high-resolution files.

‘The difference is in the details,’ says Albert Yong. The music is more open in general, and the sounds are more open in general. ‘The voice and instruments sound more alive and dynamic.’

Is 24bit Audio Worth It?

The dynamic range of 24-bit audio is greater (16,777,216 binary combinations) and there is less noise. Both bit depths have virtually no noise; 24-bit is preferred for studio audio editing.

A greater dynamic range means that the audio can be played at higher volumes before distortion occurs. As a result, when they see 24-bit audio, they automatically assume clearer or higher-definition audio, but this is not the case.

We must consider all the aspects of sound quality to know which one suits us best for our preferences in music.

Can You Tell The Difference Between FLAC 16 Bit And FLAC 24 Bit?

When people claim to hear significant differences between 16-bit and 24-bit recordings, it is most often the difference in the quality of the digital remastering that they are hearing, not the difference in bit depth.

When it comes to music listening, you’ll want at least 16-bit audio. The hiss in the background is caused by digital noise, which is present in low-bit audio.

The bit depth is what makes the difference. A standard CD is 16-bit; a 24-bit CD cannot be ripped. Most people can’t tell the difference between most systems, but it depends on your equipment, your room, and your ears.

It is extremely simple to test and see what you think.

A portable speaker placed horizontally onto a rocky surface
16 BIT uncompressed CDs are still in use for listening to music in the cars while traveling

What Is The Best Audio Bit Rate?

To choose the best audio bit rate, you’ll need to consider a lot of points. It depends on the audio bit rate size. The sound quality improves by increasing the kilobits per second.

Although 320kbps is considered an ideal one, the CD-quality that extends to 1411kbps is among the best ones.

Personal needs should be kept in mind while choosing the best of all.

However, as the number of kilobits increases, so do the drawbacks. The higher the bit rates, the faster the storage fills up. If we had a 320kpbs MP3 file, it would use 2.4MB of the storage data while a 128kbps file would only use 1 MB.

In contrast to that, an uncompressed CD occupies the greatest amount of storage, which is 10.6MB per minute.

So what’s best, a medium-sized file with a good storage capacity, in which it has to be installed? while CDs require a lot of space and processing time.

Here is a video that tells us about the detailed comparison between 16 BIT and 24 BIT.

Here is a list of some dynamic ranges and bit depths that we all can relate to.

  • A 1 meter away hum of an incandescent bulb is 10dB.
  • In a quiet recording studio, the background noise is 20dB.
  • In a normal quiet room, the background noise is around 30dB.
  • The dynamic range of early analog master tape was only 60dB.
  • The dynamic range of LP micro-groove records is 65dB.

Now you know about some of the dynamic ranges that various things in our daily lives have?

The DJs use music modulator devices, one of them is shown in this image
Most of the time DJs prefer using audio modulators for adjusting the audio effects in a club or other musical events.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, a 16-bit uncompressed CD has a lot of variations to that of a 24-bit high-resolution FLAC. Both of them differ in unique ways, with one being better than the other. 

For recording and bouncing audio, the most common bit depths are 16-bit and 24-bit. Each sample can have up to 65,536 different amplitude values thanks to the 16-bit format.

As a result, 16-bit offers 96dB of dynamic range between the noise floor and 0dBFS. You get 144 dB of dynamic range between the noise floor and 0 dBs with 24 bit.

Therefore, one must choose the version of sound quality that best suits their needs and preferences.

Here is an article on the difference between the commonly confused HDMI 2.0 and 2.0B: HDMI 2.0 vs. HDMI 2.0b (Comparison)

Other Articles

Gender Apathetic, Agender, & Non-binary Genders

Is There Any Difference Between Businesses And Businesses (Explored)

HDMI 2.0 vs. HDMI 2.0b (Comparison)

Skip to content